Why 960 × 640? →

marco:

What’s the average-person selling point for the high-density display that will overcome the downsides? 

It is perfectly understandable that the creator of Instapaper would see this change in terms of reading.  But the iPhone HD is going to have a 960x640 display for showing super high quality video from it’s internal camera.

Cellphone video has always pretty much sucked.  This is a great area where Apple has an opportunity to not only deliver something great— but to deliver something competitors can’t match.

Apple has an HD Format that they quietly introduced last year called iFrame.  The format of this video? 960x640.  This perfectly matches a pixel doubled iPhone display, and this is not a coincidence.

Over the last several years, we’ve seen two major trends— the replacement of point-and-shoot cameras with cellphones, and the addition of hd video on cameras of all types.  We’ve also seen the rise of inexpensive HD cameras of low quality, such as the flip and kodak zi6. 

The downside of most cameras that shoot video is that their manufacturers made poor codec choices.  AVCHD is designed to work with optical disks and TVS, and with no concern for what will happen with the video.  Thus despite Apple shipping iMovie for almost a decade, most consumers have no convenient way to edit their movies.  iFrame is a codec that is easily editable without a transcoding / importation step.  Just copy the files onto your computer and iMovie works with them natively.  This is huge for anyone who shoots a lot of video.

In one release, for $199 (with 2 year contract) Apple is going to release a video camera that delivers much higher image quality, in a much more usable codec, in a package with a gorgeous display to show off this gorgeous video.  And make consumer video vastly more relevant than it has been since the initial boom in days of DV.

This is also a product which shows how Apple’s vertical integration pays off— they make the CPU in the phone which shoots the video, the computer to edit it which comes with a built in editing suite.   Both the phone and the computer help sell each other as part of a total solution. 

But the clear selling proposition for consumers— what Marco actually asked for— is that for $199 you can get a high quality video camera, that shoots stills, and you get the phone, and the iPod, etc. for free.

1 year ago
link reblogged from marco
33 notes

  1. tobias-kaufmann liked this
  2. anna-winkler liked this
  3. internetabzocke liked this
  4. jeffreymfoster reblogged this from marco and added:
    res display keeps...high-end iPhone feeling & looking superior
  5. optionshiftk liked this
  6. kxr liked this
  7. danielpietzsch liked this
  8. zen-y liked this
  9. neomac reblogged this from marco and added:
    is perfectly understandable...the creator of Instapaper would see this change
  10. smartgoat liked this
  11. penllawen reblogged this from essdogg and added:
    don’t disagree!...consumers are absolutely happy having
  12. steelopus liked this
  13. coyotesqrl reblogged this from essdogg and added:
    (This is not my usual Apple-bashing; this is a serious question about the iPad and future devices of its class from...
  14. essdogg reblogged this from penllawen and added:
    I see what you’re saying but I think it’s...reductive argument.
  15. coyotesqrl liked this
  16. essdogg liked this
  17. penllawen reblogged this from marco and added:
    This perfectly summarises why,...Daring Fireball wasn’t writing about it, I’d
  18. craigz liked this
  19. redcloud liked this
  20. jamesgill reblogged this from marco
  21. esjewett reblogged this from marco and added:
    everyone listened...what people cite as...problem with their...
  22. alexbain liked this
  23. aedison liked this
  24. disneyzane liked this
  25. marc liked this
  26. gtokio reblogged this from marco
  27. sendmelies liked this
  28. iwasframed liked this
  29. marco posted this

  Ask me anything

neomac is Powered by Tumblr and runs the Mindless Theme by Justin Cox